to some
to some
, and I therefore desire to state the reasons which not Uggs Outlet only induce, but oblige me to take it.My first objection rests upon general principles. The real, absolute necessaries of life ought not to be taxed, unless there be some strong and urgent necessity for it; and then no longer than the necessity for the tax continues. Here the tax on salt is unnecessary; the revenue is abundant without it.Salt black ugg boots is an absolute, natural, and real necessary of lifeother things may, from use, be thought necessary, as tea, coffee, sugar; but salt is, in its nature, a real necessary to life and one without which life and health cannot be maintained. It is absolutely necessary to animal life and health. Horses, cattle, and sheep must be fed with it; and immense numbers of them die yearly for the want of a sufficient quantity of it. On such an article, is it proper then to retain a duty of twenty cents on a bushel? More salt should be used; more would be used if it was cheaper, and it should be made as cheap as possible, by freeing it from taxation.The poor man, for himself, his wife, and his children, must consume of salt, moncler outlet and pay of his tax, as much as the rich man, for himself, his wife, and childrenand as the poor man's family is often the most numerous, he must pay the most of the tax. You make him pay the more, exactly in proportion as he is less able than the rich man. This is contrary to all principle. Taxes should be levied on men according to their ability to pay. Is it too much to relieve the poor man, by reducing his tax at first to fifteen, and afterwards to ten cents on a bushel? I do not say these things to court popularity with the poor. I say them because eternal justice proclaims them to be right, whether they be popular or unpopular.A few days since, we passed a bill reducing the duties on tea and coffee, because these are supposed to have become necessaries, and are used by the poor as well as by ugg boots cheap the rich. There were only six votes against that bill; and will any gentleman tell me that salt is less a necessary than tea, coffee, or cocoa, or less consumed by the poor?On principle, therefore, salt, as a natural necessary of life, ought to have been taxed twenty cents a bushel, or two or three times as much as its foreign cost; and the reduction of the tax to ten cents a bushel is but slow and partial justice to the public, as the tax will still be equal to the expense of making a bushel of salt at the Salina, or any good salt works.It is said that the reduction of this salt tax will be a serious injury to the State from which I come. If I believed this, I would be the last man to vote for it. I can have no inducement to uggs for cheap wrong that Statemy home is theremy friends are thereall my interests and all my attachments are thereand I can only wish her prosperity. I hope to show, as I am satisfied is the fact, that the State cannot lose by the reduction of this tax, which will profit every citizen of that State.At present, New York herself levies an excise duty of twelve and a half cents on every bushel of salt manufactured uggs sale at the salt works in that State. My colleagues allege that, in this manner, the State, by a tax upon her citizens, raises a revenue of about one hundred and fifty-seven thousand dollars towards her canal fund; that, if the United States reduce their duty on imported salt to ten cents a bushel, the State, in order to save the manufacturer, will be obliged to reduce her duty on domestic salt, and, instead of this revenue, impose a direct tax to pay her canal debt. Every part of this deserves examination.If the United States reduce the duty on this article, it will save exactly so much to every citizen who uses foreign salt; and the State will undoubtedly amend her laws and constitution so as to reduce her tax on salt, which will be a saving to that amount to every citizen who uses domestic salt.If by these means the canal fund loses one hundred and fifty-seven thousand dollars, do not the citizens of the State gain it by their exemption from the payment of the tax? Because, after all, very little of this salt tax is collected from the citizens of other States. Is it not nearly all paid by the oitizens